Make the leader's vote the tie-breaking one,
- instead of the current first vote. If it's a dumb idea, at least it's the leader's fail ;)
It's disheartening to come to the vote and see a dangerous choice, knowing that one can't do anything to stop it. Especially if one is supposed to be the leader. If one isn't the leader, it's not so bad.
With two players, it also means that the first one to act decides what gets done all the time, making the vote an unnecessary delay.
Aaron Abenoja commented
leader +2 instead of +1? to vote. . the way im putting it is like may as well say if the leader votes he may as well have leader +5, but then again if leader votes A and the the other three vote B then that is A + 2 and B + 3 so that could be good. .
I thought this was the way it was. Strange to learn its the other way.
AdminNick (Manager, 10x10 Room) commented
This is something we are seriously considering.